Friday, March 13, 2009

Bizarre & Offensive Online Gallery Fearmongers For Terror Attacks in London, NYC















UK Telegraph Carries Vulgar Propaganda In Arts & Culture Section

Paul Joseph Watson
Monday, January 26, 2009

A bizarre, anonymous and offensive picture gallery currently appearing on the website of the London Telegraph newspaper that tells the story of a terrorist nuke attack on London has left many asking questions about its origin and meaning.


The slide show features on a section dedicated to art, culture, film and music but seemingly holds no artistic credence whatsoever, comprising merely of a series of crude pictures designed to instill fear into the viewer. The only purpose of the gallery is presumably just a continuation of the incessant drone of fearmongering propaganda from the establishment media and authorities about the imminent inevitability of a mass casualty terror attack.

Entitled “Blackjack,” the gallery begins with a date, June 20 at 2pm, followed by an MI5 logo and the text “MI5 report warns government of imminent terrorist attack”. This certainly makes sense because MI5 and MI6 have proven themselves adept at controlling terrorist groups and carrying out attacks in the past, including paying Al-Qaeda $100,000 in the mid-80’s in a failed attempt to assassinate Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

After we learn that the attack will be the work of “home grown extremists, Islamists and Christian doomsday cultists,” the date switches to June 21 at 12pm as a nuclear bomb is loaded onto a white van in London. As Cryptogon.com notes, the ‘fictitious’ attack occurs during the Summer solstice, the name on the side of the van is New Dawn Presentations and the logo is the Sun. The white van also harks back to the Kingstar (controlled demolition company) van that was pictured near the exploded bus after the 7/7 London bombings.

After citizens panic buy groceries and flee London in droves, on June 22 at 8:03am, the nuke explodes in central London. The images then show the devastation in the aftermath of the attack as the Houses of Parliament, Buckingham Palace and Big Ben lay in ruins.


This is only the end of part one and in part two we are promised similar devastation with an image of millions fleeing New York City.


This disgusting and pointless “gallery” cannot be classed as culture, art or anything of the sort - it is nothing more than gratuitous and macabre pornography for those in establishment, and believe me there are many, that yearn for another 9/11 or worse in order to unravel their contemptuous political agenda.


What kind of sick mind created this and why was it allowed to feature so prominently on a major UK newspaper website? This is vile, vulgar propaganda and downright offensive, especially to the millions of people who live in London and New York City and have already suffered terrorist attacks, both of which were carried out with the complete complicity of the British and U.S. governments, within the past decade.

PART TWO

Despite calls, questions and complaints to the UK Telegraph as to the purpose and origins of a bizarre, offensive and crudely put together “photo gallery” depicting a nuclear attack on London, the newspaper is now featuring part two of “Blackjack” on its website, which portrays six major cities being nuked before a fascist “Union of North America” is implemented. As we revealed in our previous story, the first installment of the gallery featured on a section of the Telegraph website dedicated to art, culture, film and music but seemingly held no artistic credence whatsoever, comprising merely of a series of crude pictures designed to instill fear into the viewer.

The series of images is also replete with occult symbols with which those who have researched the Illuminati will be familiar. In the second part of the series, at 8:03am on June 22nd six cities, New York City, Washington DC, Toronto, Mexico City, Portland, and Los Angeles, all suffer a nuclear attack as mushroom clouds are depicted rising over the skyscrapers. The crumbling remains of the cities are shown one week later.

The final few images show a revised US flag with five stars in the middle, with black fighter jets roaring overhead as well as a “Department of Homeland Security Emergency Transmission” which tells people to “Stay at home and await further instructions”. The logo on the bottom right of the mock screenshot is of a Nazi-style eagle below the words “UNION OF NORTH AMERICA”. At the bottom of the logo are the words “Norvus Ordo Seclorum” or alternatively “Norvus Ordo Emporium” (the resolution isn’t high enough to make out the last word). Norvus Ordo Seclorum translates as “new order of the ages” or more traditionally, “new world order”.

The last image shows a British police officer with the Nazi-style eagle on his helmet and the “Union of North America” flag on his uniform. Presumably the message being sent is that a series of nuclear terror attacks will bring in a fascist style world government which will be headed by a union of America, Canada, Mexico and Britain. What on earth is the purpose of this “photo gallery”, who is the author and why is it being featured on a major UK newspaper website with no explanation whatsoever? Without proper clarification, this amounts to nothing more than bizarre fearmongering and propaganda. It is also downright offensive to people who live in the seven cities being depicted as targets for the nuclear attacks.

According to readers who contacted and questioned the Telegraph as to the origin and meaning of the picture gallery, the response was belligerent and hostile. “I just called the Telegraph about the Blackjack Nuke scenario story they posted on their website,” wrote David Icke forum member “free at last”.

“THEY FREAKED OUT!!!!”
“No one wanted to talk about it and then after speaking to four different people the last guy got snotty and hung up the phone.” “There is something behind this, they never even tried to play it down, just got aggressive with me.” “When I called he practically wanted to interrogate me on the phone and got very wound up that I dared to inquire about it, Who are you? What’s your business? I was asked and slammed the phone down on me,” he added.

Another forum member who called the Telegraph was told “who are you and of what concern is this of YOURS?” “I informed him I was a concerned reader, it did not matter where I was from and I required some information re: the source of this “story”, an explanation as to why it was the LEAD story and how it was deemed “culture”. “I also asked “who is the regulators body that governs online content and how do I contact them?” … He never answered this one.” Others who called the Telegraph received the same aggressive, interrogative overreaction when they asked about the gallery.

But the questions need to keep being asked. This so-called “gallery” has no artistic merit whatsoever, so what is it doing in the “arts and culture” section of a major British newspaper? Part 2 cannot even be considered to have a plot, it just shows a series of major cities being nuked and then amateurish photo-shopped images of Nazi-style symbols on flags and police uniforms.
Is someone’s sick fantasy being afforded exposure on a major UK newspaper website or are we being prepared for something? The rude and hostile response to people who have attempted to get clarification from the Telegraph only deepens the mystery.

PART THREE

The London Telegraph is continuing to run a crude propaganda piece in it’s arts and culture section that depicts nuclear attacks on major cities, the formation of a world government, and a police state crackdown on citizens complete with concentration camps and the implementation of martial law.

As we revealed in our original article, the first installment of the gallery entitled “Operation Blackjack” featured on a section of the Telegraph website dedicated to art, culture, film and music but seemingly held no artistic credence whatsoever, comprising merely of a series of crude pictures designed to instill fear into the viewer.

Part 2, which we covered in a second article, cannot even be considered to have a plot, it just shows a series of major cities being nuked and then amateurish photo-shopped images of Nazi-style symbols on flags and police uniforms.

Now a third installment of the baffling piece depicts the fallout of nuclear attacks on London, New York City, Washington DC, Toronto, Mexico City, Portland, and Los Angeles. This time the piece has been photoshopped in the style of a comic book, perhaps in a poor attempt to give it the impression that it has some artistic merit. The Telegraph received a great deal of complaints after our first two articles.

One of the first images shows a map marked “Teardrop - Eyes only” which features the flag of the newly formed “Union of North America” (UNA) - a new government composed of America, Canada, Mexico and Britain. Some men in suits, presumably representatives of the “UNA” are looking at map and “the glasseye reports”, which constitute the scale of destruction wrought on the attacked cities. These men seem to be pleased with situation stating “this has exceeded our wildest expectations” and calling for “phase 2″. Clearly from this we are supposed to deduce that these men, representatives of the new world government, are somehow involved in the events that have taken place, despite the fact that we were told religious extremist terrorists were the culprits. The next set of images depict an announcement by the UNA to citizens everywhere that the union has begun carrying out military attacks on China, Syria and Iran, who are now apparently somehow also to blame for the earlier nuclear attacks.

Several more images show a state of martial law has been implemented and that concentration camps have been set up to hold collaborators and presumably anyone else who refuses to go along with the program. Another image shows an “Amero” coin, indicating the creation of a new global currency. What is the point of “Operation Blackjack”, why does it continue to run in the “arts and culture” section of a major British newspaper? Is someone’s sick fantasy being afforded exposure on a major UK newspaper website or are we being prepared for something?
Could it be that in the fictionalization of false flag terror, the creation of detention centers and the push for global government, someone is attempting to relegate such real world issues to the pages of a comic book? As we previously highlighted, the rude and hostile response to people who have attempted to get clarification from the Telegraph only deepens the mystery.
TO SEE THE ENTIRE ARTICLE ALONG WITH ALL THE ACCOMPANYING PICTURES THAT WERE PUBLISHED FOLLOW THIS LINK:

No comments:

Post a Comment